Printable Page
Did you know?
IDS Anti-Aromatase is a extrogen blocker!
|
 |
| Learn the secrets of the pro's to get in the best shape possible with proper nutrition! |
Disciplined Nutrition
For Premium Progress
The millions that view flab as the most disgusting
ingredient of human flesh have, for years, waged war
against its presence. Yet, through all their clashes,
fat has emerged victorious a dreadful number of times,
only to foster the same frustration that ignited so
many ill-advised attempts to destroy it. This inevitably
has led dieters down two seemingly different paths -
one of indulgence, the other, starvation.
The destructive forces of overeating are well chronicled.
After numerous failed attempts with dieting gimmicks
and bogus potions, succumbing to fast-food fantasies
casually becomes a justifiable alternative. In time,
a healthy meal plan is as automatic as Homer Simpson's
exercise regimen, and a steady diet of McDonald's combo
platters is an insurmountable addiction. Thus, it is
not surprising that America exhibits such extraordinary
health problems, the likes of which have done little
to avert those whose diets contribute to the soaring
obesity that shackles an appreciable physique. If you
truly are what you eat, then 50 million Americans are
a Big Mac with extra cheese and a large side of fries.
Deceive The Body And The Body Strikes Back
Though the above example reaches the extremes of a
hopeless, carefree cuisine, the results of a starvation
diet can also be a disaster of catastrophic proportions.
The logic behind it is intuitive: fat is hideous, so
eliminate it (and all calories for that matter) from
the diet. By this rationale, the dieter assumes that
the body has no choice but to begin slashing inches
off its carcass. In reality, this is hardly the case.
In fact, just the opposite is usually true, such that
the body responds by administering its fat strangle-hold
even tighter, making the process of weight loss almost
impossible.
If the human body
could list its top ten most efficient
processes, adaptation would probably rank
number one.
Evolution's millions of years have shaped the
body into a species that is geared not
for the production of a
slim waist or muscular arms, but for survival.
In ages prior, when restaurants were about
as plentiful as the
wheel, periods of famine prevailed. Yet, so did
the human race. The catch, unfortunately,
is that those
with a considerable propensity to store fat survived.
Thus, the twentieth-century version of
our ancestors
is one that has adapted to years of food shortages
through a nauseating ability to maintain
a pear-shaped torso.
So much for "Survival of the fittest."
When the innocent dieter initiates a restrictive diet,
the conditioned response by the body is to kick into
the aforementioned survival mode. This, in essence,
is a signal to store fat to offset an anticipated period
of deficient caloric intake. Compounding matters is
a gradual decline of the body's metabolism, rendering
the process of fat loss even more difficult. The process
is no different than any other the body performs when
encountering change - it adapts. Instead of perceiving
food as the culprit, it should rather be viewed as fuel.
Food is fuel for an increasing metabolism, fuel for
the release of fat-burning and muscle-building hormones,
and finally, fuel for a healthy diet and a normal lifestyle.
When food is eaten in the precise amounts, the body
again must adapt. This time, however, it adapts to the
notion that its needed energy will be granted. When
this gift is awarded, the body responds with its own
goodwill gesture, a liberation of its suddenly unnecessary
fat stores.
Facts And Fallacies Of Food
The constituents of all food can be separated into
three types: protein, carbohydrates, and fats. Together
they form the basis of all diets and, along with exercise,
ultimately determine changes in body composition. This
is achieved through hormonal release, an increase in
metabolism, and the preservation and enhancement of
muscle tissue.
Proteins are considered the body's building
blocks for repair, maintenance, and muscular growth.
Adequate protein intake ensures the preservation of
muscle tissue and enhances recovery from both strenuous
workouts and daily activities. Since exercise causes
significant damage to muscular tissue and subsequent
growth requires adequate recovery, a lack of protein
is often the missing factor. Without it, muscle may
be spared and appreciable decreases in metabolism will
soon follow. This, as illustrated previously, is a splendid
method for accumulating a fatty midsection.
Fallacy #1: The RDA For Protein Is Sufficient
The recommended
daily allowance (RDA) for protein is approximately
.36 grams per pound of body weight. Therefore,
according to the RDA, a 200 lb. man would
require a
mere 72 grams of protein daily. This may be sufficient
for a sedentary individual like the vice
president,
but when factoring in strenuous activity such
as endurance or weight training, the RDA
is grossly inadequate. In
fact, research studies have suggested that consuming
the RDA for protein during periods of
intense training
may lead to loss of muscular tissue (17, 10).
It is apparent that protein requirements
depend on an individualƳ
activity level, such that a range between .64
and .91g of protein per pound of body
weight is appropriate (17,
10).
The body's primary fuel for energy is derived from
carbohydrates. They are especially important
for aerobic activities and high-volume weight training,
and are also utilized during periods of recovery. As
was the case with protein, inadequate intake of carbohydrates
can compromise exercise performance and duration. However,
carbohydrates have also demonstrated an air of infallibility
in the recommendations of most dieticians, though perils
do exist even with this vaunted energy source.
Fallacy #2: The More Carbs The Better
Contrary to what is often uttered about the wonderful
merits of carbohydrates, the fact remains that excess
carbs lead to excess inches. With the exception of the
overly lean individual with a speedy metabolism, where
weight gain is often the goal, overindulgence of high
carbohydrate foods can be as detrimental to waistlines
as excess fat. It is often stated that spare carbohydrates
are, in large part, stored for energy. However, it is
more likely that excess carbohydrates will be converted
to body fat (3). Furthermore, studies have shown that
identical improvements in body composition, strength,
and muscular endurance can be achieved with diets that
derive as little as 40% of their calories from carbohydrates
versus those that contained over 60% (15, 19). Studies
have also repeatedly demonstrated that the sum caloric
intake is the predominant factor in weight loss and
an elevated carbohydrate intake is not advantageous
(1, 7).
It is obvious that fats have endured more than
their share of abuse. Saturated fats, in particular,
are considered a key contributor to heart disease, an
epidemic that has claimed more lives than the flood
in Genesis. Fats also carry over twice as many calories
per gram than both carbohydrates and protein. Though
it is true that an excessive fat intake is the best
way to resemble a blimp, it's also a fact that fat is
necessary for proper metabolic function, hormone production,
and as an energy source.

Learn About Different Types Of Fats HERE!
Fallacy #3: Avoid Fats Entirely
Most American diets are either too deficient or too
abundant in fat intake. As stated previously, neither
method is a successful tactic for weight loss. When
examining the habits of most restrictive diets, there
is a prevailing assumption that all dietary fat can
only be deposited to adipose tissue. This is an absurd
misconception. In reality, the body utilizes dietary
fat for energy in a state of negative energy balance
(21). As long as the total caloric intake is less than
what is expended, the percentage of fat in the diet
is not as significant as once thought. Studies have
also affirmed that equivalent differences in weight
loss can be achieved with diets consisting of approximately
10-50% fat, as long as the total calorie consumption
was identical (1, 7).
With these menacing fallacies of food exposed, it is
evident that the low calorie, low fat, high carbohydrate
diets that have been advocated for years are in fact
fallacies themselves. A long-standing, correct approach
to weight loss is the procedure whereby more calories
are expended than ingested. Unfortunately, this has
formed the basis of extremely low calorie diets, diets
that result in the loss of vital muscle tissue and a
striking decrease in metabolism. Take, for example,
the Slim-Fast diet. This is a nice, convenient drink
that is akin to a small cup of milk and copious helpings
of sugar. With few calories, a meager appearance by
protein, and no fat, the body exhibits a ruthless preservation
of adipose tissue, a greater propensity for fat accumulation,
and a yearning for real food and a normal life. The
low-calorie deception offered by such diets is further
augmented by an overload of sugar and similar carbohydrates,
yet another frustrating contributor to ballooning belt
sizes.
All Carbohydrates Are Not Created Equal
Now that it's intuitive to avoid excess carbohydrates,
the type of carb must also endure similar scrutiny.
Though all carbohydrates are broken down into glucose
and released into the bloodstream, the speed at which
this process occurs varies drastically with different
carbohydrates. Interestingly, this absorption rate is
a critical factor in energy levels, fat reduction, and
overall health. Fortunately, foods have been assigned
a glycemic index, a measure of how fast their carbohydrates
enter the bloodstream to be utilized as energy or stored
as glycogen (a preserved energy form). High-glycemic
foods, therefore, are available quickly for use as energy.
Though this may seem optimal, in actuality they trigger
a hormonal reaction that has reverse effects.
|
Only AndrovarE by IDS uses etherated technology with proven liposomal 4 Androstenediol (4-AD) technology, the same technology used in the tremendously successful mass product Testovar 555, to deliver possibly the most powerful one - two punch in androgenic supplement history!
|
|
High-glycemic carbohydrates produce a rush of glucose
into the bloodstream, elevating blood sugar levels dramatically.
This sudden rise stimulates a release of the hormone
insulin, which essentially negates the high-energy effects
of glucose. The rapid surge of insulin shuttles the
glucose out of the bloodstream, effectively dropping
energy levels to lethargic lows. To make matters worse,
the insulin also takes the fatty acid energy source
with it, shoveling it into fat cells for storage. High-glycemic
foods, therefore, exhibit a double curse, keeping consumers
fat and lazy.
In the past, it was recommended that foods high in
simple sugars (candy, cookies, soft drinks) be avoided
for the aforementioned reasons. This is true; however,
many revered energy sources are also considered high-glycemic
foods. Surprisingly, many kinds of pasta, rice, and
potatoes rank rather high on the glycemic index. Many
breads and cereals are also offensive, fast enough to
zap energy levels and hoard fat like the good-ol' days
of famine and starvation.
The opposite results, fortunately, are available with
the ingestion of low-glycemic foods. They provide for
more stable energy levels and an attenuated insulin
response, favoring the probability of productive workouts
and sustained vitality. These foods rank in the below
70 category on the glycemic index chart, which is provided
below. All foods are rated according to white bread,
which receives a very speedy score of 100. Click HERE for a list of common foods and their respective scores,
categorized into three accommodating lists:
Table 2. Glycemic Index Chart
|
HIGH |
MODERATE |
LOW |
|
Instant Rice (128) |
Ice Cream (87) |
Grapefruit juice (69) |
|
Crispix cereal (124) |
Cheese Pizza (86) |
Green peas (68) |
|
Baked Potato (121) |
White Rice (83) |
Grapes (66) |
|
Cornflakes cereal (119) |
Popcorn (79) |
Linguine (65) |
|
Rice Krispies cereal (117) |
Oatmeal Cookies (79) |
Macaroni (64) |
|
Pretzels (116) |
Brown Rice (79) |
Orange (63) |
|
Total cereal (109) |
Spaghetti, durum (78) |
Peach (60) |
|
Donut (108) |
Sweet corn (78) |
All-Bran cereal (60) |
|
Watermelon (103) |
Oat Bran (78) |
Spaghetti, white (59) |
|
Bagel (103) |
Sweet Potato (77) |
Apple juice (58) |
|
Cream of Wheat (100) |
Banana (77) |
Apple (54) |
|
Grapenuts cereal (96) |
Special K cereal (77) |
Vermicelli (50) |
|
Nutri-grain bar (94) |
Orange juice (74) |
Barley (49) |
|
Macaroni and Cheese (92) |
Cheese tortellini (71) |
Fettucine (46) |
|
Raisins (91) |
Chocolate (70) |
Lentils (41) |
Since foods are usually eaten in combinations, note
that the glycemic index of a meal is usually lower than
the glycemic index of the highest constituent. For instance,
if equal calories of a bagel and an apple are combined,
the glycemic index of that meal becomes a more acceptable
79. Protein also helps matters, such that they efficiently
decrease the total glycemic index by slowing the absorption
rate of carbohydrates. This emphasizes the importance
of combining protein and carbohydrates in each meal.
Food: A Potent Hormone Trigger
As stated, the hazards of one hormone, insulin, are
encouraged by the ingestion of high-glycemic foods.
While insulin promotes fat storage, a substance known
as growth hormone (GH) effectively burns fat, builds
muscle, and improves the immune system. This provides
another advantage to low-glycemic foods. If low-glycemic
foods are emphasized and blood sugar levels remain stable,
a positive environment exists for GH to exert its effects
(13).
The exploits of the muscle-building hormone testosterone
are even more profound. Studies have demonstrated that
testosterone is chiefly influenced by the ratios of
food in the diet. Therefore, the percentages of protein,
carbohydrates, and fat can have dramatic effects on
changes in body composition. For instance, for the individual
seeking added muscular mass, a low protein to carbohydrate
ratio and a moderately high-fat intake are necessary
for maximal testosterone output (20, 14). This is not
to suggest a reduction in protein intake; rather the
percentage of carbohydrates in the diet should be much
greater than protein (20). Furthermore, the source of
food also influences testosterone concentrations, such
that a vegetarian diet produces much lower testosterone
levels than a meat-rich diet (12).
A diet high in red-meat, however, is also an abundant
source of saturated fat. Though the reasons for avoiding
saturated fats are well established, such as their contribution
to heart disease, other forms of fat can be quite beneficial
for normal metabolism and hormone production. The fats
contained in fish, for example, should be emphasized
in the diet. In addition, olive, sunflower, and canola
oils are rich in monounsaturated fatty acids, a form
of fat that is a powerful stimulant of testosterone
(20).
Planning The Metamorphosis
Before an appropriate, individualized diet can be incorporated,
an accurate reading of body fat percentage must first
be performed. Since daily calorie requirements depend
both on the amount of lean body mass (all bodily constituents
except fat) and activity level of an individual, this
is a necessary estimation. This is because of the radically
different metabolic processes required to maintain muscle
as opposed to fat. Specifically, muscle requires a great
deal of energy to sustain it, while fat basically sits
(or hangs) there. As a result, the daily calorie intake
should be sufficient to maintain muscle, not fat. Therefore,
the differences in protein and calorie requirements
of two men of the same weight, one at 10% fat and the
other at 20%, are astounding.
Once body fat percentage is known, there are three
primary stages in developing an ideal calorie level:
1) determine metabolic rate, 2) choose an appropriate
protein intake depending on lean body mass, metabolic
rate, and activity level, and 3) select a suitable nutrient
ratio according to metabolic rate and body composition
goals. The following tables provide the completion of
all three stages.
Table 1. Fast, Moderate, and Slow Metabolic
Rates
1. Fast
- Individuals with a fast metabolic rate exhibit low
weight and body fat levels, have trouble gaining muscle,
and can generally eat like pigs with no adverse consequences.
2. Moderate
- These individuals generally desire to maintain body
weight, decrease fat, and slightly increase muscle
mass. Excess calorie intake usually results in mild
weight increases.
3. Slow -
A slow metabolic rate usually equates to a high propensity
for weight and fat gain. These individuals desire
extensive weight loss.
Note:
These estimates are subjective and do not exactly encompass
all types of metabolic rates. In reality, everyone is
different. It should be emphasized also that varying
degrees of all three rates exist. Namely, fast-moderate
and moderate-slow metabolic rates are common and can
be utilized as intermediaries in the following tables.
|
Table 3. Protein Requirements as a Function of Lean Body Mass and Activity Level
|
NOTE: A automatic calculator is below! Just enter your info and press submit.
Activity Level
|
No Exercise |
Light Exercise (3X/Week) |
Strenuous Exercise
(3-4X/Week) |
Strenuous Exercise
(5X/Week) |
Intense Exercise (5+X/Week) |
|
(1) |
(2) |
(3) |
(4) |
(5) |
Note:
Light exercise refers to walking, jogging, or low-intensity
sport activities. Strenuous exercise is considered weight
and/or endurance training, while intense exercise is
heavy weight training and endurance training. No exercise
refers to high intensity computer programming followed
by an evening of "Must See TV."
|
METABOLIC RATE
|
GRAMS OF PROTEIN / LB LEAN BODY MASS
|
| ACTIVITY LEVEL: |
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Level 4 |
Level 5 |
|
Fast |
.6 |
.8 |
.9 |
1.0 |
1.2 |
|
Moderate |
.5 |
.7 |
.8 |
.9 |
1.1 |
|
Slow |
.4 |
.6 |
.7 |
.8 |
1.0 |
Table 4. Nutrient Ratios as a Function of Metabolic Rate
|
Percentage
of Daily Caloric Intake
|
|
|
Fast
Metabolism
|
Moderate Metabolism
|
Slow Metabolism
|
|
Protein |
17% |
22% |
27% |
|
Carbohydrates |
58% |
55% |
52% |
|
Fats |
25% |
23% |
21% |
Use Our Auto Calculator! Just Enter Your Data Below.
* If you need help figuring out your body fat percentage, get some cheap calipers to test yourself in the privacy of your own home.
Note:
One gram of protein or carbohydrate equals four calories,
while one gram of fat is equal to nine.
Example 1
This individual is a 5'9",
140 lb. male with 5% body fat. He exhibits a fast metabolic
rate and utilizes intense weight training 4-5
times
a week (activity level 4) in an attempt to gain weight.
To determine his caloric requirements, simply
calculate
lean body mass and choose an appropriate protein intake
and nutrient ratio.
- 140 lbs. x 95% lean body mass = 133 lbs. lean tissue
- This individual would require approximately 1.0g
of protein per pound of lean body mass, or 133g daily.
- Protein would therefore account for 532 calories
(133g x 4 calories per gram). He would then utilize
a nutrient ratio where protein consisted of 17% of
his daily calories, such that 532 divided by 17% would
result in the daily calorie intake.
- 532/.17 = 3129 total calories/day. To determine
the amount of carbohydrates and fat, simply multiply
this number by their respective percentages. For example,
the daily carbohydrate intake would be 1814 calories
(3129 x .58), or 454 grams (1814 calories/4 calories
per gram). The daily fat intake is 782 calories (3129
x .25), or 87 grams (782 calories/9 calories per gram).
- Optimally, this person should eat 5-6 meals per
day. If 5 meals are consumed, each meal would average
approximately 626 calories, in the same ratio of nutrients
as described above. Of course, this number will vary,
especially since post-workout meals should contain
more calories.
Example 2
This individual is a 6'0",
190 lb. male with 18% body fat. He desires to lose a
little weight and a lot of fat to become "toned." Since
he gains weight rapidly if his calorie intake soars
too high, he is considered to have a moderate-slow
metabolism. He currently trains with weights and runs
for thirty minutes five times per week. He would therefore
fall between activity levels four and five, requiring
approximately .85-1.05 grams of protein per pound of
lean body mass.
- 190 lbs. x 82% lean body mass = 156 lbs. lean tissue
- 156 lbs. x .95g protein = 148g protein daily
- Protein would therefore account for 592 calories
(148g x 4 calories per gram). A nutrient ratio for
an individual with a moderate-slow metabolism would
be 24.5% protein, 53.5% carbohydrates, and 22% fat
(percentages derived from using the average of moderate
and slow metabolism ratios). This individual's daily
calorie intake is determined by dividing 592 by 24.5%,
resulting in 2416 calories.
- Utilizing the same method as outlined in example
1, the daily carbohydrate intake is 1292 calories,
or 323 grams. The daily fat intake is 531 calories,
or 59 grams.
The Importance of Nutrient Timing
The number and content of daily meals is an extremely
important but overlooked facet of proper nutrition.
The timing and quality of foods ingested, especially
pre- and post-workout, is often the difference between
a successful diet and another failed attempt at physique
enhancement.
Skipping breakfast, avoiding post-workout
meals, and consuming high-glycemic carbohydrates before
workouts can easily transform a sound meal plan into
an unwitting disaster. Interestingly, however, even
the most sensible diets ignore the crucial nature of
nutrient timing.
As stated numerous
times, elevating the metabolic rate is one
of the most efficient ways to burn fat. The
digestion
of meals requires calories by itself, so the more often
the body must break down food, the more efficient
it
becomes. Therefore, small meals should be consumed
throughout the day to maximize the metabolic
response. Related
to this is breakfast, the "most important meal
of the day." Though the post-workout meal may
be equally important, the consumption of a large breakfast
has been shown to result in significantly greater fat
losses than diets that avoided it (8). Since the metabolic
rate is fastest in the morning and slows throughout
the day, it is more likely that the calories consumed
during breakfast will be utilized by the body and not
stored as fat. Skipping breakfast, on the other hand,
may result in vital losses of muscle and a subsequent
decrease in metabolism.
For much the same reason, the post-workout meal is
equally essential. Following exercise, the body exhibits
an elevated metabolic rate, much like it does upon awakening.
A lack of food following exercise, therefore, results
in muscle tissue breakdown and, of course, a corresponding
tumble of the metabolic rate. Research has proven that
the synthetic rate of protein doubles following exercise
and remains elevated for over 24 hours (11, 4). In other
words, the body is primed for the acceptance of protein
for muscle maintenance and growth. Equally important
is the ample consumption of carbohydrates. Following
exercise, the body is somewhat depleted of its glycogen
stores. Remarkably, it has been shown that high-glycemic
carbohydrates post-workout are the preferred source
to replenish the body's energy stores (5). Not only
does this result in greater storage for recovery and
subsequent workouts, but it also significantly decreases
muscle breakdown (16).
To obtain the most optimal effects of the previous
findings, post-workout meals should contain about twice
the normal amount of carbohydrates and protein and should
be ingested immediately following exercise. For example,
an individual eating five meals per day and 3000 calories
would consume a post-exercise meal of approximately
1000 calories, while the other four meals would average
500. All subsequent post-workout meals should also contain
a larger percentage of protein than pre-workout meals
to comply with the body's elevated protein synthetic
rate.
A final fitness faux
pas is the pre-workout meal. How many fitness
enthusiasts eat a bagel before exercise?
It seems that this is one of the most common pre-workout
foods due to its alleged energy benefits. However,
look
at its glycemic index it's a whopping 103. The
detrimental effects of this are monumental. The corresponding
insulin response will not only decrease energy stores
for exercise; it will also prevent fat breakdown at
the same time. Fortunately, low-glycemic foods have
much the opposite effect. They exhibit the ability
to
improve exercise performance without significantly
compromising energy stores after a workout (9, 18).
This, in turn,
leads to enhanced recovery and accelerated progress.
A Word About Consistency
A suggested meal plan is not perfect, and individual
tinkering will be required to determine the ideal diet.
Losing weight too quickly is a sign of muscular and
water loss, not necessarily fat loss. Therefore, those
individuals should increase their caloric intake slightly.
The same is true for similar imperfections; slight modifications
are required and variety is encouraged. Remember that
the body adapts to all changes, so an identical food
and daily caloric intake will not only drive one to
insanity, but also to stagnation.
If there is one truth about building an improved physique,
it's that it takes focus, dedication, and consistency.
Losing or gaining weight should be a slow, gradual process
to ensure the changes are of the appropriate type. This
is one of the reasons so many diets fail and the gimmicks
appear. In the future, everything short of chemotherapy
will be offered as the new miracle in weight loss. In
time, it too will fall by the wayside and fat will settle
hideously to the waistline. And all the while, lurking
in reality, is everything short of quitting, the true
miracle in physique excellence.
REFERENCES
- Alford, B., A. Blankenship, R. Hagen.
The effects of variations in carbohydrate, protein,
and fat content of the diet upon weight loss, blood
values, and nutrient intake of adult obese women.
J Am Diet Assoc. 90(4):534-540. 1990
- Anderson, K., et al. Diet-hormone
interactions: protein/carbohydrate ratio alters reciprocally
the plasma levels of testosterone and cortisol and
their respective binding globulins in man. Life
Sci. 40: 1761-1768. 1987
- Baechle, T. Essentials of Strength
Training and Conditioning. Human Kinetics: Champaign,
IL. 1994. p. 215
- Biolo, G., et al. Increased rates
of muscle protein turnover and amino acid transport
after resistance exercise in humans. Am J Physiol.
268(3 Pt 1): E514-520. 1995
- Burke, L., M. Hargreaves, G. Collier.
Muscle glycogen storage after prolonged exercise:
effect of the glycemic index of carbohydrate feedings.
J Appl Physiol. 74: 1019-1023. 1993
- Foster-Powell, K., J. Miller. International
tables of glycemic index. Am J Clin Nutr. 62(1):
871S-890S. 1995
- Golay, A., et al. Similar weight
loss with low- or high-carbohydrate diets. Am J
Clin Nutr. 63(2):174-178. 1996
- Keim, N., et al. Weight loss is greater
with consumption of large morning meals and fat-free
mass is preserved with large evening meals in women
on a controlled weight reduction regimen. J Nutr.
127(1): 75-82. 1997
- Kirwan, J., et al. A low glycemic
meal 45 minutes before exercise improves performance.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 28(5 S): S768. 1996
- Lemon, R. Protein and amino acid
needs of the strength athlete. Int J Sport Nutr.
1:127-145. 1991
- MacDougall, J., et al. The time course
for elevated muscle protein synthesis following heavy
resistance exercise. Can J Appl Physiol. 20(4):
480-486. 1995
- Raben, A., et al. Serum sex hormones
and endurance performance after a lacto-ovo vegetarian
and a mixed diet. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 24:
1290-1297. 1997
- Rabinowitz, D., L. Ziebler. Suggested
variations in plasma insulin and HGH concentrations
during one feast-famine cycle. Nature. 199:
913-915. 1963
- Reed, M., et al. Dietary lipids:
an additional regulator of plasma levels of sex hormone
binding globulin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab.
64: 1083-1085. 1987
- Rinehardt, K. Effects of diet on
muscle strength gains during resistive training. In:
Muscle Development: Nutritional Alternatives to
Anabolic Steroids. Columbus, OH: Ross Laboratories,
1988. pp. 78-82
- Roy, B., et al. The effect of oral
glucose supplements on muscle protein synthesis following
resistance training. Med Sci Sports Exerc.
28(5 S): S769. 1996
- Tarnopolsky, M., J. MacDougall, S.
Atkinson. Influence of protein intake and training
status on nitrogen balance and lean mass. J Appl
Physiol. 64:187-193. 1988
- Thomas, D., J. Brotherhood, J. Miller.
Plasma glucose levels after prolonged strenuous exercise
correlate inversely with glycemic response to food
consumed before exercise. Int J Sport Nutr.
4(4): 361-373. 1994
- Van Zant, R., J. Conway, J. Seale.
Effects of dietary carbohydrate restriction on high
intensity exercise performance. Med Sci Sports
Exerc. 24:S71. 1992
- Volek, J., W. Kraemer, J. Bush, T.
Incledon, M. Boetes. Testosterone and cortisol in
relationship to dietary nutrients and resistance exercise.
J Appl Physiol. 82(1): 49-54. 1997
- Walberg-Rankin, J. A review of nutritional
practices and needs of bodybuilders. J Strength
and Cond Research. 9(2):116-124. 1995
Click HERE To Read Part One!
Part 1: The Scientifically Proven Approach to Training and Nutrition
IDS Sports
Recommend this article to a friend by e-mail here! Back To IDS Sports' Main Page
Back To The Articles Main Page.
Related Articles
Diet Is Everything: Weight Gain
Supplementing And Eating Big
EGGS-actly What You Need To Build Muscle!
|
|