I play football and need to know which one is better please e-mail me

By Anonymous on Wednesday, February 23, 2000 - 07:52 am: Edit

Creatine AC by Met-RX is better than both.

By Anonymous on Wednesday, February 23, 2000 - 08:10 am: Edit

I have used ceel tech an dloved it I just got osme phospagen hp and haven't tries it yet but I knwo that cell tech works!

By Anonymous on Thursday, February 24, 2000 - 09:44 am: Edit

Is that you Bobbie?

By ANOMALY ( - 209.94.216.80) on Sunday, June 11, 2000 - 05:48 pm: Edit

Cell TEch is a SCAM,the main ingredient alpha lipoic acid (ALA) is COMPLETLY OXIDISED on contact with the air,ie absolutely USELESS in this supplement.Obviously Muscle Tech does not know this because they have nothing to do with science,heck they don't even fund scientific studies so how can they say that there supplements are backed by science?easy,they use scientific studies from other supplement companies such as EAS and AST,plus Muscle Tech are so FAKE that they even interpret these scientific all WRONG,what a bunch of LOSERS,and this is the reason why EAS and AST (the best and leading supplement companies)did not add ALA to their creatine formula.as fas as i'm concerned Muscle Tech has nothing to do with SCIENCE...
Muscle Tech is a scam.i've been using phosphagen HP and AST's creatine formula for 3-4weeks,and my biceps measurement went up from 15 inches to 16.5 inches.my weight went up from 190-210lbs.Now that is REAL POWER..the kind EAS and AST supplements are known to deliver.
EAS and AST are the supplement that can be trusted.don't study GREG KOVAK who endorses CELL TECH,look at his DISGUSTING physique,he is definitely ON STEROIDS.disgusting.
Pohsphagen HP and Creatine HSC are the BEST....

By Anonymous ( - 64.12.105.28) on Friday, January 05, 2001 - 06:40 am: Edit

guys, i have used cell-tech in the past, and to be honest, i really havnt noticed anything, im 16 years old, i weigh 190lbs and im 6', before taking cell-tech, i could bench 230, after 2 months of cell tech, i could bench 255, but i had been getting results like that just from protien, so my question is, what are the ingrediants in phosphagen in grams because im going to buy that wholesale and mix my own creatine up, hopefully i wont get screwed over again the way cell-tech did to me before

By Tom25 on Friday, January 05, 2001 - 08:36 am: Edit

Cell-Tech is the better product because there is more creatine per serving than that of the EAS Phosphagen and also because there is 200 grams of Alpha Lipoic Acid in it. I have tried many brands of creatine before and I could not believe the unbelievable pump Cell-Tech gave me. In the first week alone, I gained 8 lbs. and my bench press went up 20 lbs. EAS Phosphagen really didn't do anything for me. Neither did AST's creatine. I think it was a more potent product when it first hit the market. I am continuing to take Cell-Tech and am making tremendous gains!

By Big Red Machine ( - 195.92.198.77) on Friday, January 05, 2001 - 10:23 pm: Edit

Shouldn't that be 200mg of Alpha Lipoic Acid and not 200 grams. I have to agree with you about AST's creatine. I noticed no size increase or strength increase.

By Anonymous ( - 152.163.194.207) on Saturday, January 06, 2001 - 08:29 am: Edit

ok, ive heard that the ALA deconstructs in liquids and it will be worthless when u drink it. Ive heard from many people you should take 2 100mg pills with the creatine, but not mixed in because it wont do anything that way, i dont know much about this im just looking for feedback, and what does ALA exactly do anyways?