|
|
![]() By: Paul Morgan
In a recent soccer match, a superb cross from the right landed just in front of a right-footed player near the 18-yard box. All he had to do was hit it with his left foot, but he literally fell over himself trying to hit it with his good foot. Now this was amazing: an international player earning £25,000 a week without an effective left foot! But no one in our predominantly right-handed world seemed to give it a second thought. How many youth coaches systematically attempt to improve the non-dominant side of their athletes? None, in my experience, yet this is the starting point for every music teacher. My nine-year-old daughter has better bilateral co-ordination than most world-class soccer players. This is not as amazing a claim as it may sound and the reason is simple: she plays the piano. We never ever hear about pianists who are brilliant with their right hands, but who can't manage a note with their left. This is true of players of most other musical instruments - but not players of sport. Anecdotal evidence suggests that people who learn a musical instrument later in life can achieve a high level of bilateral competence or two-handed dexterity. If they can do it, surely so can £25,000 a week footballers - or top class cricket and rugby players? In cricket, ambidextrous fielders make shot selection difficult, leaving batsmen unsure as to whether to aim shots to their right or left. It is very noticeable (when you start looking) how many world class players take right hand catches with ease and drop much easier left hand ones; and how many lose time switching the ball from one hand to another to throw it in.
Apparently, in rugby union it is very hard to get players to practice moves involving left to right passing. In rugby league it is customary to put weaker defensive players on the left hand side (the opposition's right) because fewer balls move this way in a game.
Video analysis of lateral preferences has a significant impact on sport tactics. For example, it is well known that forcing a soccer player with a good right foot and a weak left one onto the left will hamper his effectiveness. But surely the time has come to take the tactical game one stage further - to eliminate weak left feet by transforming prevailing thinking about hand/foot/eye domination? Research into musical competence suggests that it is possible to develop bilateral coordination in sport.
These comprised non-musicians, keyboard musicians and string musicians. The non-musicians were found to have the largest asymmetry, or discrepancy, between their hands; the string musicians a smaller asymmetry; and the keyboard players, the smallest discrepancy of all. The most exciting finding of all in the study was that reduced asymmetry was related to the age of the children. The earlier they started playing the higher the degree of mixed-handedness. It seems that early manual skills training interacted with development of hand-motor dominance, leading to improved performance of the non-dominant hand. Sports coaches and early-years educators should take note that this is exactly the experience of my daughter and thousands of other musical students. All it takes is a few minutes' practice each day.
Some Examples:
Are such potential benefits restricted to the very young? What about those in their thirties or fifties or even beyond? All the indications are that most of us have the potential to improve our bilateral co-ordination. Take that international soccer star who fluffed his shot for want of a good left foot. He could start by kicking a ball against a wall with his left foot and then aiming - again with his left foot - at targets on the wall. Dribbling with his left foot around cones or other obstacles could help to ring the changes. But he may have such a good right foot that any initial fumbling with his left may discourage him from persevering. Top class performers, just like young children, need constant motivation and encouragement to develop bilateral co-ordination This may not be forthcoming because most coaches (and many psychologists and sports scientists) underestimate the significance of the relationship between lateral preference and sporting achievement.
Corballis made the simple yet compelling point that the physical structure of both hands (and feet or eyes) is the same, so the differences must be neurological. Most of us have a dominant brain hemisphere, further magnifying the complexity of these options. Stanley Coren, author of Left Handers (John Murray, 1992), and Clare Polac, his research collaborator at the University of British Columbia, tried to establish if 'sidedness' could predict any aspects of a person's sporting success. They began by measuring the handedness, footedness and, to coin a new word, eyedness of 2,611 people active in 15 different categories of sport. The first question they asked was: does right- or left- handedness make a difference? Baseball
They showed that (with the exception of pitchers) 14% of all baseball players were left-handed, exactly the same proportion as men in the general population. In contrast, 26% of pitchers were left-handed.
Coren commented:
"This high percentage of lefties suggests that the people who hire major league pitchers believe that left-handed pitchers have some advantage over their right-handed colleagues.
"However, to take this analysis one stage further, we looked at the overall performance of left- and right-handed baseball players. We don't find any difference in baseball proficiency related to handedness." Winning Edge Of Boxing Lefties
Overall, being mixed-handed may be better for sports like basketball, ice hockey and field hockey which require an ability to respond to either side. The good basketball player can dribble the ball with either hand; and receive or pass the ball with either or both hands. The hockey player has to shift his grip on the stick rapidly to power a shot from right or left, as needed. Moreover, the very act of swinging a hockey stick requires co-ordination of both hands. In contrast, racquet sports like tennis, squash and badminton favour dominant-handed players. Although, as in hockey, the player must respond to either side, the racquet requires only one hand to guide and power it. In addition, while the grip shifts in hockey, the racket grip remains constant: only the arm movements and the body stance changes. Being strongly and consistently one-sided may help in rifle and pistol shooting, archery and bowling because the dominant eye is used for sighting. The dominant-eyed person always uses the same eye in sighting and aiming: the mixed-eyed person sometimes sights with one eye and sometimes with the other. People are not usually conscious of which eye they use for aiming.
Congruent hand-eye preference is associated with better performance in racquet sports. When the dominant eye and hand are on the same side, Coren explained, the larger field of vision covers the area where most of the action occurs. If, for instance, a player is left-eyed and right-handed (cross-sided), the hand swinging the racquet is invisible from the dominant eye for most of its swing. The right side view is partly blocked by the bridge of the player's nose. Because aiming is done with the dominant eye, any small corrections in the racquet's swing would come quite late. If the player is right-eyed and right-handed (congruently-sided), the racquet appears in the field of vision earlier in the swing, leaving time to make minor adjustments to improve overall accuracy.
Gymnastics In sports such as gymnastics, activities like tumbling, vaulting and swinging from the rings or high bar depend upon equal action from both sides of the body. A shift in the focus of the weight to the dominant side will add a slight tendency to twist to the body. Any such twists away from perfect alignment, if large enough, mar performance, resulting in lower scores. Additional strength and skill is needed to correct such tendencies. A person with a better-centered weight focus does not need to be so concerned about this problem. Generally, people with crossed hand-eye preference seem to have the center of gravity closer to the midline of the body, giving them better balance and hence better performance in gymnastics. Basketball
Track
Such corrective movements waste energy and move the competitor from side to side. This can make a decisive difference in a 100m races won by fractions of a second - and waste motion in longer races. For the crossed-sided runner, with the focus of the body weight more directly centered, the need for such sideways correction is greatly reduced, enabling him or her to concentrate all effort on advancing forward. Baseball
This is the perfect stance for the right-handed and left-eyed (crossed-sided) player. As the dominant eye is usually used for sighting and aiming, having the preferred eye towards the pitcher should be an advantage. As a Briton, let me point out that the same holds true for cricketers.
I'd like to finish as I began - by asking you to compare the bilateral co-ordination of young pianists with that of sports internationals. Music teachers have been hitting the winning keys for many years. When are coaches going to follow their example and narrow the chasm between left and right? We hope our new curriculum pack will fill this vacuum for the five to eight age group. But I would like to reiterate that the potential benefits of bilateral coordination are not restricted to the very young. Most of us have the potential to develop bilateral coordination. Exercise regimes in the 'Quantumcoaching Curriculum Pack' are based on research suggesting that specific physical activity can change physiological and mental 'stuck' states. The secret is doing brief stand-up movements that cross arms or legs over from one side to the other. These work by forcing the left and right hemisphere to interact vigorously with each other.
These activities should be incorporated into every coaching session. The emphasis should be on small incremental steps to take athletes towards the desired standard. The ultimate aim in cricket coaching may be to train players to throw powerfully and accurately with the left hand. The first session may be limited to picking up a static ball and hitting the wicket from 5m with the left hand. The final one may involve picking up and throwing a static ball and hitting the wicket from 30m, using the left hand 90% of the time. An initial soccer session may involve players tapping a static Brazilian weighted football into the goal from 5m 100% of the time. This may be followed with practice with the left foot from 15m - with the aim of hitting the target 90% of the time.
Paul Morgan Recommend this article to a friend by e-mail here! Visitor Reviews Of This Article!
Related Articles
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||





In
Musical Test




Southpaw is slang for a left-handed person. It finds its origins in the baseball practice of arranging the diamond with the batter facing east to avoid the afternoon sun.




Click To Enlarge.













