|
|
![]() By: IDS Sports
Exercise & Building Hormones
Gaining mastery of one's hormonal framework lies
at the heart of attaining the lean, muscular physique
that
admits no flaws. Bulging biceps, sweeping shoulders,
a slender midsection, and powerful legs emerge from
the proper manipulation of the myriad of hormones
that
dictate our physical and emotional state. The body,
being very resistant to change, must be attacked
with
the precise application of the correct stimulus to
achieve the desired result. The chosen instrument
is commonly
exercise, a wise selection, but its usual application
is so fraught with holes that it does little more
than
offer a disservice to the innocent trainee.
The haphazard approach to exercise has never been
an effective avenue for physique enhancement. For
all but
the genetic elite, this undertaking is met with futility
and disappointment, culminating in a newfound hatred
for the pursuit of fitness and health. Caught in
the
web of exercise's many intricacies are its ambitious
disciples, the exercising enthusiasts that inevitably
fall prey to the latest training vogue. Lost in
their
aspirations for a body that demands admiration, however,
is an appreciation for science. Advancing constantly,
science offers hope that the body will resoundingly
conquer the beast that is exercise. With new research
comes answers, results, and a shredded set of abdominals.
The Myth Of Getting Toned
Upon questioning
the novice about his training goals, the most common
answer is undoubtedly a burning devotion
to become "toned." In his mind he fancies
the look of solid pecs and a six-pack of abs - not quite
as much muscle as Arnold Schwarzenegger, yet quite a
bit more than Gandhi. However, in his quest he justifies
ineffective training tactics, such as utilizing so-called
"shaping and toning" exercises, citing his
abhorrence for squats, dead lifts, and strenuous training
because he longs to be lean and graceful, not beefy
and awkward. Label him victimized, uninformed, and
eventually
frustrated.
The primary mode
to achieving the coveted "ripped" appearance
should be to increase lean body mass. As muscle
mass increases, so too does the metabolic rate
and the potential for fat loss. For every one pound
of muscle that is gained, upwards of 100 additional
calories daily are burned at rest. By far the most
efficient
formula for increasing lean body mass is weight training.
However, although utilizing the precise methodology
will result in cherished new muscle, a faulty approach
will only pave the path of disgust.
The second procedure for attaining a prized physique
is to directly stimulate lipolysis, or fat burning.
The most common method employed is to use a low
intensity
exercise regimen for a long duration. While this is
an appropriate protocol for tapping into fat stores
directly, it is not effective for many reasons.
First
of all, it is an insufficient method to increase the
metabolic rate. Second, its apparent efficiency
in burning
fat is shattered by the astonishing fact that one pound
of adipose tissue can supply the body continuously
for
over ten hours. Compounding that revelation is the
notion that, although fat stores are utilized, there
are no
guarantees that the fatty acid energy source is derived
from adipose tissue. Other potential sources are
plasma
free fatty acids and intramuscular triglycerides, which
do not directly stimulate fat loss (10, 18). The
trainee
is then left with two choices: exercise continuously
for 72 hours at a time, or stimulate the appropriate
fat burning hormones. The choice is elementary.
Igniting the Muscle Building & Fat Burning Stimulus This growth response is the result of the
presence of potent anabolic (muscle-building) hormones
whose function is to promote protein synthesis.
As more
fibers are involved, a greater hormonal response is
necessary, and thus greater changes in whole muscle
are possible (1).
Related to this concept is the motor unit, defined
as a motor neuron and all the muscle fibers that
it
innervates. To involve the greatest number of muscle
fibers, the largest motor units must be stimulated.
Upon excitation of these motor units, numerous signals
are sent from the brain to various endocrine (hormone-producing)
glands (1). As the number of activated muscle fibers
increases, a multitude of responses occurs which
prime
the muscle for the acceptance of the anabolic hormones
that result in muscle growth and strength (1). Recruiting
these large motor units demands utilization of heavy
resistance training with exercises involving multiple
muscle groups. This means applying exercises such
as
the squat, dead lift, bench press, and shoulder press
into the routines of those seeking improved muscular
development.
Gaining appreciable muscle mass is a constant internal
struggle between protein synthesis and protein degradation.
Influencing the conflict are numerous external factors,
such as recuperation, intensity of training, diet,
and
genetics. These elements also have an astounding effect
on the hormonal environment. The specific hormones
involved
can be grouped into anabolic and catabolic (growth
inhibiting) categories. The objective of exercise
is to apply the
precise stimulus to induce an anabolic response. However,
if the stress is too great, the catabolic hormones
will
supersede their anabolic counterparts and overtraining
will invariably result. To avoid this, strict attention
must be paid to appropriate recuperation and diet.
Furthermore,
intermittent layoffs and periods of decreased training
intensity are necessary to augment future muscle
hypertrophy,
since the hormonal response is increased after these
intervals.
Although fat burning is a welcome by-product of
larger muscles, there also exist hormones (some
that are also
anabolic) that dramatically slash body fat percentages
and midsections alike. Their release is correspondingly
spawned through strenuous activity and specific
training
protocols. For instance, intense running or a decreased
rest interval between sets of weight training has
proven
to be very effective at maximally stimulating fat-burning
hormones. Remarkably, an advantage it has over muscle
building is the fact that as training experience
increases,
the propensity for lipolysis is additionally enhanced
(3, 4, 13, 16).
The Hormonal Contestants
Well practiced in the art of muscular growth is testosterone.
A remarkably potent hormone, it directly increases protein
synthesis and exhibits an intimate relationship with
the nervous system. It is testosterone that is activated
by exercises involving large motor unit stimulation
that result in increased structural changes within muscle
(11). In short, testosterone spurs extraordinary muscular
growth and strength. In addition to its vaunted effects
on protein synthesis, it may also indirectly stimulate
the release of another anabolic substance, growth hormone.
Growth Hormone (GH), as its name implies, is
another powerful stimulant of anabolism that also sprinkles
in a few favorable twists. Not only does it promote
muscular growth, but it is also involved in increasing
lipolysis, lowering blood pressure, and improving the
immune system. Though not fully understood, many of
its actions also involve the excitation of a third set
of anabolic hormones, the insulin-like growth factors
(IGFs). Stimulating the release of IGFs increases the
availability of amino acids for protein synthesis and
results in greater tissue repair and growth (1). As
was the case with testosterone, it appears that the
recruitment of large motor units is necessary for GH
to exert its anabolic and lipolytic effects (17).
The catecholamines are an interesting group
of hormones. Among their vast array of effects are an
increased use of fat for energy, increased contraction
rate and force production of muscle, and an augmentation
of other hormones such as testosterone and the IGFs.
The catecholamines, mainly epinephrine and norepinephrine,
may also inhibit the release of insulin, a hormone
that pushes free fatty acids back into fat cells (13).
Through this inhibition and their influence on the liver
to cause adipose tissue lipolysis, the catecholamines
make stripping a much less embarrassing proposition.
Unfortunately, a continual rise in anabolic hormones
triggers counteractive mechanisms to maintain the
body's
present state. This drawback is effectively accomplished
by the representative catabolic hormone, cortisol.
Though it may increase the mobilization of free fatty
acids, this effect is largely overshadowed by its protein
breakdown activity. With cortisol, which is released
under physical and emotional stress, amino acids are
burned for energy instead of utilized for growth. This
increases the likelihood of muscular atrophy in the
face of strenuous exercise, which for some is a free
ticket to insanity. In the long term, excessively high
cortisol levels can even diminish physical health.
Unleashing The Hormonal Arsenal
It is never too late to take advantage of the benefits
of the preceding hormones. With effort comes progress,
and with progress comes motivation. Initiating an
exercise
program and adhering to it are very difficult without
proper planning and goals, but it soon becomes instinctive
as obstacles are surmounted and character is elevated.
With adequate knowledge of how hormonal monopoly
is
achieved, the keys to the internal framework are revealed
and mastery is gained.
Since muscle growth is a primary objective, taking
command of testosterone and GH is mandatory. In
the
gym, this translates to using large muscle group exercises,
heavy resistance, short rest intervals, and moderate
to high volume. It is very rare to see this combination
of factors employed consistently by most weight
trainers.
Why? Because it's often excruciating and requires a
mind bent on pillage! Leg extensions and concentration
curls have their place, but nothing will stimulate
shocking
whole-body reconstruction like squats and dead lifts.
Remember, with large motor unit stimulation and
exhaustion
comes an unparalleled release in anabolic hormones.
The next factor to consider is the amount of weight
lifted, including the number of repetitions performed.
For optimal testosterone release, a resistance that
is 85-95% of a one-rep maximum should be utilized
(1).
For instance, 90% of a 200 lbs. maximum bench press
is 180 lbs., and this weight would allow approximately
five repetitions, an ideal range. To further augment
testosterone release, a one to three minute rest
interval
between sets is necessary (1). The release of growth
hormone closely parallels that of testosterone;
however,
higher repetitions are optimal, along with short rest
periods. The most prolific regimen for GH release
appears
to be a ten rep maximum approach with one minute rest
intervals, which can increase production 20-40 times
above baseline levels (1, 13). One research study
displayed
an even greater increase from a set of 25-rep squats
(9). These fluctuations in optimal hormone release
conveniently
point to the necessity of training variability.
Variety in training may be one of the most important
but overlooked concepts in all of exercise. Given
the
body's tremendous ability to adapt to physical stress,
continual variation between individual workouts
is imperative.
For instance, the differences in the optimal release
of testosterone and GH provide an excellent basis
for
modifications between training sessions. Applying a
5/1 (five rep max, one minute rest) approach for
one
workout and a 10/1 approach on another prevents plateauing
and boredom; it also more efficiently allows for
progressive
increases in resistance to be maintained between workouts.
Also, a 5/1 approach may be optimal for maximum
testosterone
release, but it may require a decrease in the amount
of resistance used on subsequent sets. In this case,
a 5/3 protocol adds the spice of variety. Other
profitable
tips for avoiding the humdrum of training include periodically
changing exercises, the speed at which repetitions
are
performed, and hand/foot placement.
A final factor influencing muscle gain, which can
also be manipulated for variety, is the volume of
training.
This most readily refers to the amount of sets to be
performed in a given workout, as well as the amount
of recuperation permitted between training sessions.
These conditions appear to be largely influenced
by
individual variation. As a general rule, however, weight
training sessions should be limited to approximately
45 minutes. This is due to the fact that the anabolic/catabolic
hormonal ratio begins to tip in favor of cortisol
at
this time. With this in mind, the amount of sets to
be performed should be dictated by the chosen rest
interval.
For example, a one minute rest interval will allow
the performance of numerous sets, while a three
minute interval
will permit using greater resistance.
Generally, however, larger muscle groups (i.e.,
legs, back, chest) require a greater number of sets
than smaller
groups (i.e., biceps, triceps). Given this notion,
larger muscle groups should comprise 60-75% of the
total work
sets. For example, if a high intensity workout (5 rep
max, 3 minute rest, 45 minutes total) consists of
14
total sets (not including warm-up), the large muscle
groups would account for approximately 8-10 sets,
while
the smaller groups would take 4-6 sets.
Determining the number of days between workouts
of the same body part is subject to tremendous variation.
Some thrive on training five to six times weekly,
while
others can withstand only two or three. The factors
influencing this variable of training volume are
innumerable,
but the most important ones appear to be training experience,
intensity of training, diet, and the exercises employed.
Beginners will experience a great degree of delayed
onset muscle soreness when initiating a weight-training
program and hence will require more rest. Additionally,
more recovery is required after sessions of high
intensity
training. High intensity, in this case, refers to training
to muscular failure with near maximal poundage.
When
choosing exercises, also bear in mind that larger muscles
require more recuperation. Thus when training with
movements
that recruit a great number of muscle fibers (i.e.
squats and dead lifts), more rest is necessary.
Shedding The Fat
A favorable side-effect of GH release through weight
training is an increase in lipolytic activity. GH
appears
to stimulate the production of adipolytic lipase, an
enzyme which mobilizes fats, and this serves to
trigger
a shift towards using fatty acids as an energy source
(13). Though a weight training regimen that utilizes
high repetition maximums and minimal rest is rather
taxing in its own right, large GH peaks have also
been
discovered during high intensity running. Specifically,
the trainee should utilize a running intensity that
is 75-90% of maximal heart rate to adequately stimulate
GH output (max heart rate can be obtained by calculating
220-age). Obviously, this will not allow for long
durations,
so periodic walking should be performed between sets
of high intensity running. A further advantage to
this
form of training is that it burns calories at a higher
rate than any other activity and improves cardiovascular
fitness dramatically.
In addition to GH, the catecholamines have extraordinary
effects on fat loss. They are also very responsive
to
high intensity training with minimal breaks, which
can increase levels to over 20 times those at rest
(12).
Two important factors concerning the effects of the
catecholamines, however, are training experience
and
the presence of glucose in the bloodstream. Incredibly,
as training experience increases, the body becomes
more
efficient at burning fat, such that there may be a
50-80% increase in the amount of free fatty acids
mobilized
when in the trained state (3, 16).
This may be due
lactic acid, a by-product of energy expenditure
that is responsible
for the burning sensation during training. As lactic
acid concentration increases, the use of free fatty
acids for energy decreases (8). This may be a drawback
to training at high intensities and short rest intervals;
however, as the body becomes more adept at handling
this type of training, fat burning capabilities
increase
remarkably. Lactic acid is, however, associated with
increases in circulating growth hormone (1). As
a result,
further augmentation of the fat burning response is
seen at rest. With chronic training, there is a
significant
increase in the amount of fatty acids expended at rest,
and a shift toward using them for energy during
recovery
(13).
A second factor that initiates a greater response
from the catecholamines is a decreased blood glucose
level
(4). Specifically, epinephrine release is heightened
in situations where glucose levels are low, as is
the
case upon awakening. This would preferably tap into
adipose tissue for energy as the body attempts to
maintain
the depleted glucose stores. By this rationale, morning
workouts, as agonizing as they may sound, are ideal.
Similarly related to the topic of glucose is the
hormone insulin. As blood glucose levels rise, so
does insulin,
and the amount of free fatty acid mobilization decreases.
This provides more support for morning workouts;
it
also advises against the ingestion of foods containing
high amounts of sugar prior to training, which spike
levels of blood glucose. Fortunately for those seeking
physique enhancement, however, insulin release is
inhibited
by high intensity training (15).
Adaptation - An Unnecessary Evil
Besides a lack of motivation, a lack of progress
is probably the number one reason trainees prematurely
quit their exercise programs. Then again, a lack
of
motivation is often the result of dwindling progress.
To avoid staleness in training, considerable attention
has been paid to variation, but necessary periods
of
decreased training intensity have not been addressed.
For example, the use of progressive resistance (a
gradual
increase in loads over time) is necessary for improvement,
but this may also serve to facilitate the release
of
cortisol. To avoid this explicit danger, training intensities
should not be increased linearly; rather, periods
of
high intensity training should be followed by periods
of low to medium intensity exercise for maximal
progress.
The detrimental effects of cortisol also seem to be
most pronounced during periods of concurrent endurance
and strength training (2, 14).
Another reason for scant progress is the continual
loading of the same muscle fibers, as is the case
when
employing the same exercises for a succession of workouts.
As muscle fibers approach genetically predetermined
levels of hypertrophy, the amount of protein synthesis
occurring in those fibers decreases (1). Further
growth
instead becomes possible through the lack of protein
degradation, effectively endorsing the use of variation
in exercise selection and procedure (1). Varying
the
manner in which exercises are performed (i.e. hand/foot
placement, repetition tempo), as well as periodically
using different exercises altogether, will stimulate
otherwise tranquil muscle fibers into new growth.
Putting It All Together
The Exercises
Note: The following are considered the best exercises
for stimulating the greatest amount of muscle fibers.
These should provide the basis of any weight training
program; however, exercises must be periodically
alternated
to maintain progress.
Chest: Bench Press, Incline
Bench Press, Decline Bench Press (all three may be performed
with a barbell or dumbbells);
Weighted Parallel Bar Dips
Shoulders: Shoulder Press
(barbell or dumbbells), Lateral Raises
Back:
Dead lifts, Chin-ups, Bent-over Rows, One-arm Dumbbell
Rows, Seated Pulley Rows
Arms: Standing Barbell
Curls, Incline Dumbbell Curls, Close-grip Bench presses,
Lying Tricep Extensions
Abdominals: Variations
of weighted crunches
Legs: Back Squats, Front Squats, Leg Press, Hack Squats, Dead lifts, Stiff-legged Dead lifts, Leg Curl
Calves: Standing Calf
Raises, Seated Calf Raises Note: The following are only examples of short term training schedules. There is no perfect program for everybody. The trainee should select the most accommodating one, or use a similar variation depending on individual discrepancies.
Click HERE To Read Part Two!
Part 2: Disciplined Nutrition for Premium Progress IDS Sports Recommend this article to a friend by e-mail here!
Related Articles
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||




Molding a lean, muscular physique involves both
the production of added muscular mass as well as
a corresponding
decrease in adipose tissue (fat). This much is obvious.
Within the common approach, however, arise the flaws.
Whether the goal is
As stated, it is the type of program utilized that
ultimately dictates the corresponding hormonal response.
Both muscle and fatty tissue adapt to the fluctuating
concentration of circulating hormones. In the case
of
a muscle fiber, it must be broken down systematically
through resistance training. The fiber, in turn,
responds
with an increase in the synthesis of new contractile
proteins that result in the fiber becoming larger
and
stronger.





